Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4130 - 134 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $41.13 vs $279.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - $0.33 vs $2.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
124
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |