Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G1610 - 162 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $37.0 vs $273.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $273 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76841 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.501613944480308%
Multi-Core
739
11.812659846547314%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |