Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2788 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-2120T - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $60.0 vs $279.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-9700F - $0.32 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |