Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 840 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Starfield than Core i3-7100T - 61 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $48.1 vs $279.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-9700F - $0.89 vs $4.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |