Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $51.6 vs $268.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-13600K - $0.08 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Minecraft than Core i3-7100T - 861 vs 675 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
675
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
861
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
25%
Price, $
$268.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |