Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 373 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-10320 - 153 vs 152 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $120.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-9700F - $0.79 vs $1.93 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15341 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |