Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 373 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $139.99 vs $220.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-9700 - $0.92 vs $1.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-10320 - 153 vs 152 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
99.34640522875817%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
63.88888888888889%
Price, $
$220
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
98.90745501285348%
Multi-Core
4626
74.40887888048898%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |