Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $120.0 vs $209.99
- Up to 23% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-14400F - $0.98 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 34% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-10320 - 164 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2231 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
76%
Price, $
$209.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |