Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 1239 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8350 - $100.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Lost Ark than FX-8350 - $0.45 vs $0.83 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 0% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-950 - 224 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
