Buy on Amazon
$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2410 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-880 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $88.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-880 - $0.35 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
250
99.60159362549801%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
77.77777777777777%
Price, $
$112
78%
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3669 minutes ago
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 2.9 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread CPU Processor 2M 51W LGA 1151
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
