Buy on Amazon
$180
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-875K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-875K is 877 days older than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 3% cheaper than FX-8350 - $180.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8350 - $1.62 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-875K Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4100 minutes ago
AMD FD8350FRHKWOX FX-8350 Octa-core (8 Core) 4 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4.20 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 125 W (AMDFD8350FRHKWOX)
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
