Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1620 - 206 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $49.0 vs $199.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-8700T - $0.26 vs $0.97 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
26.804123711340207%
Price, $
$199
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3026 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
187
90.77669902912622%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3022 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
30.93797276853253%
Multi-Core
723
15.412492005968875%
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |