Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1767 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1620 - 241 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
241
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$186
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |