Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1620 vs Ryzen 7 5800X

Celeron G1620 vs Ryzen 7 5800X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2894 days newer than Celeron G1620.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620

  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

  • Performs up to 36% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1620 - 121 vs 89 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

89

73%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Logo
Ryzen 7 5800X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020


FPS

121

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.67/FPS

100%

Price, $

$202

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor

Buy for $202 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 131 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Logo
Ryzen 7 5800X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo
Celeron G1620

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

409

18%

Multi-Core

723

7%

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Logo
Ryzen 7 5800X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020


Single-Core

2178

100%

Multi-Core

10263

100%

Intel Celeron G1620 Logo

Intel Celeron G1620

vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Nov 5th, 2020
CeleronCollectionRyzen 7
Ivy BridgeCodenameVermeer
Intel Socket 1155SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
2Threads
16
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.8 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.7 GHz
55 W
TDP105 W
22 nmProcess Size
7 nm
27.0xMultiplier
38.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Celeron G1620 or Ryzen 7 5800X

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.