Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3883 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7500F - $49.0 vs $223.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 7500F - $0.39 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1620 - 148 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
127
85.8108108108108%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1809 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
25.82781456953642%
Price, $
$223.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $223.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |