Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-870 is 121 days older than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G6950 - 115 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-870 - $47.48 vs $100.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-870 - $0.42 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
113
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-870 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Lynnfield | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |