Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1666 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1620 - 159 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $49.0 vs $443.02
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $443.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
28.98653437278526%
Multi-Core
723
9.211364505032488%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |