Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7800X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7800X is 66 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7800X
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 237 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-7800X - $109.99 vs $479.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-7800X - $0.47 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7800X - 16 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
23%
Price, $
$479.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $479.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
234
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7800X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |