Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3710 days newer than Core i7-720QM.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i7-720QM - 195 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-720QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-720QM doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-720QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-720QM | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 12.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
