Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $120.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13400F - $0.9 vs $6.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6900K - 143 vs 134 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5649 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.29/FPS
14%
Price, $
$899.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5648 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |