Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1586 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100 - 206 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $145.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13400F - $0.78 vs $4.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.37/FPS
17%
Price, $
$899.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16332 minutes ago
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |