Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G550 - 172 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $49.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-6900K - $0.31 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11796 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |