Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 436 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 709 vs 705 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $120.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.17 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
709
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |