Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $120.0 vs $222.71
- Up to 39% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-11700F - $0.94 vs $1.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6900K - 145 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
61%
Price, $
$222.71
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $222.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |