Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 273 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $89.0 vs $92.61
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-6300 - $0.59 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 881 minutes ago
Buy for $92.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |