Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2044 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-6800K - 245 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $79.99 vs $89.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-6800K - $0.33 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |