Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1389 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8120 - 133 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $39.99 vs $180.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-6700K - $0.34 vs $1.35 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7700 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |