Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 668 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4130 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $41.13 vs $129.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6700 - $0.35 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5146 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
117
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |