Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $41.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-11600 - $0.17 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 14% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-4130 - 270 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
237
87.77777777777777%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
32.69230769230769%
Price, $
$140
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
46.88972667295005%
Multi-Core
1960
23.937469467513434%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |