Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $41.13 vs $143.7
- Up to 71% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10600K - $0.14 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-4130 - 300 vs 285 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
285
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2593 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
300
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
29%
Price, $
$143.7
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2592 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |