Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 940 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Celeron G1610 - 199 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $37.0 vs $129.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6700 - $0.2 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5464 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |