Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 940 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1610 - 160 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
32.94663573085847%
Multi-Core
739
17.85024154589372%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |