Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3572 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 25 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-640LM - 271 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 20 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
271
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$615
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Arrandale | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |