Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2553 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100T - 25 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 28% better in War Thunder than Core i7-640LM - 163 vs 127 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
25 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |