Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 2063 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i7-620M - 150 vs 144 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18576 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |