Key Differences
In short — Core i7-870 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-870 is 121 days older than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-870 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-870 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Performs up to 3% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-620M - 96 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 8 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16087 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |