Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2828 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 175% better in League of Legends than Core i7-620M - 143 vs 52 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |