Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1096
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1096
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4940MX outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4940MX is 589 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4940MX
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 128 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-4940MX - 51 vs 57 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-4940MX
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4940MX | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 57 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
