Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $305
Availability
MSRP in USD: $305
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770S is 821 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-4770S - $70.0 vs $119.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-4770S - $0.36 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3900 - 201 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel CPU BX80662G3900 Celeron G3900 2.80Ghz 2M LGA1151 2C/2T Skylake Retail
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-4770S Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.1 GHZ 8 MB Cache- BX80646I74770S
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-4770S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770S |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
