Buy on Amazon
$199.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $199.88 vs $270.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.37 vs $1.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-4820K - 150 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
146
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-4820K 3.70 GHz Processor - Socket FCLGA2011 - Quad-core (4 Core) - 10 MB Cache - 5 GT/s DMI
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
76%
Price, $
$270
74%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
