Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 855 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 47 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-4800MQ - 129 vs 125 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $92.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |