Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790T is 555 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than FX-8300 - 270 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-4790T - $106.06 vs $149.88
- Up to 25% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-4790T - $0.42 vs $0.56 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
74.99999999999999%
Price, $
$149.88
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2122 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
93.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |