Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4790T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2511 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4790T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-4790T - 163 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-4790T - $115.99 vs $149.88
- Up to 26% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-4790T - $0.71 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790T - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |