Buy on Amazon
$576.53
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $378
Availability
MSRP in USD: $378
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-4712MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1579 days newer than Core i7-4712MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i7-4712MQ - 112 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 32 vs 8 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-4712MQ
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4712MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 14th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
