Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1922 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4700MQ - 128 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700MQ - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$557.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $557.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |