Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 287 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4130 - 117 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $22.92 vs $280.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3930K - $0.2 vs $2.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4296 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |