Buy on Amazon
$349.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2005 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $349.88 vs $493.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.17 vs $2.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 15% better in Rust than Core i7-3820 - 185 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
161
87%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$349.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $349.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
81%
Price, $
$493
70%
FPS Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $493 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
