Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2991 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $295.0 vs $399.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $1.53 vs $1.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-3770S - 210 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
193
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13254 minutes ago
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |