Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770S - 603 vs 469 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $260.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770S - $0.43 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
603
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |