Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-3770 vs Core i7-11700F

Core i7-3770 vs Core i7-11700F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-3770

3.4 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-3770 Logo
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770

Buy for $122.03 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4711 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-11700F

2.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-11700F Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy for $260.91 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4712 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-3770

3.4 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-3770 Logo
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770

Buy for $122.03 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4711 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-11700F

2.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-11700F Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy for $260.91 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4712 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770

  • Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $122.03 vs $260.91
  • Up to 49% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-11700F - $0.47 vs $0.92 per FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F

  • Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Core i7-3770 - 285 vs 258 FPS
  • Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of F1 22.
F1 22

F1 22

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i7-3770 Logo
Core i7-3770

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012


FPS

258

90%

Value, $/FPS

$0.47/FPS

100%

Price, $

$122.03

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770

Buy for $122.03 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4711 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-11700F Logo
Core i7-11700F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

285

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.92/FPS

51%

Price, $

$260.91

46%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy for $260.91 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 4712 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i7-3770 Logo
Core i7-3770

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012

Intel Core i7-11700F Logo
Core i7-11700F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-3770 Logo
Core i7-3770

Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012


Single-Core

671

31%

Multi-Core

2299

26%

Intel Core i7-11700F Logo
Core i7-11700F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2101

100%

Multi-Core

8790

100%

Intel Core i7-3770 Logo

Intel Core i7-3770

vs
Intel Core i7-11700F Logo

Intel Core i7-11700F

Apr 29th, 2012Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
Core i7CollectionCore i7
Ivy BridgeCodenameRocket Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
8
8Threads
16
3.4 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.5 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.9 GHz
77 WTDP
65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
34.0x
Multiplier25.0x
Intel HD 4000
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i7-3770 or Core i7-11700F

F1 22, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.