Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 23% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8320 - 143 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $95.0 vs $260.87
- Up to 55% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-11700F - $0.82 vs $1.82 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
45.05494505494505%
Price, $
$260.87
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
116
81.11888111888112%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |